As a reviewer for Jurnal Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, your primary role is to assess the quality of submitted manuscripts based on scientific merit, clarity of presentation, and overall research contribution. Below are several key aspects to consider when conducting your review:

Relevance to the Journal’s Scope

• Does the article align with our focus and scope (informatics and information systems)?
• Is the topic relevant and valuable to the fields of informatics and information systems?

Clarity and Structure

• Is the manuscript written in formal, academically appropriate language?
• Does the article follow a clear structure, including Introduction, Methods, Results, and Conclusion?

Abstract Quality

• Does the abstract succinctly outline the study’s objectives, methods, and key findings?
• Is the abstract presented clearly?

Introduction Quality

• Is the research background adequately explained?
• Are relevant state-of-the-art references included to highlight the study’s novelty?
• Is the study’s contribution or novelty clearly stated?

Methodology

• Is the research method described in sufficient detail?
• Is the procedure transparent and replicable based on the information provided?

Results and Discussion

• Are the findings supported by appropriate data and analysis?
• Are tables, figures, and graphs used effectively and in accordance with academic standards?
• Does the discussion relate back to the research objectives and provide meaningful insights?

Conclusion

• Does the conclusion address the research objectives?
• Are any recommendations or implications for future work adequately discussed?

References and Citations

• Does the reference list follow APA Style guidelines?
• Are references sufficiently up-to-date (at least 15 references from the last five years)?
• Do at least 70% of the references come from books, journals, or conference proceedings?

Additional Notes

• Please conduct your review objectively and professionally.
• If you find any shortcomings in the manuscript, provide clear, constructive feedback.
• If the manuscript is not suitable for publication, state the reasons explicitly.

Competing Interests
Reviewers are expected to disclose any financial, personal, or professional interests that could be perceived as influencing their impartial evaluation of the manuscript. If such interests exist, reviewers must immediately notify the editorial office and, if necessary, withdraw from the review process to maintain the integrity of the publication.

Thank you for your contribution to maintaining the high standards of our journal. We value your time and expertise.