ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING VIRTUAL TEAMS PERFORMANCE ON BUSINESS PROJECTS

Main Article Content

Justin Wijaya
Carolina Novi Mustikarini
Fajar Adzani Rahman

Abstract

Current technological developments help people to transform learning in a new era to build creativity, hone skills, and improve self-quality by changing the systems, perspectives, and patterns of community interaction with technology, one of which is virtual teams. The interaction of virtual teams has become a way to run a business for organizations can survive in a globally competitive environment. Therefore, organizations need to understand what makes virtual teams more effective and get positive results from virtual teams. The object of this research is the businesses run by students engaged in various sectors who do virtual teams in running their businesses. This research aims to determine the factors that affect the virtual team’s performance. This research is quantitative research with the population of Ciputra University students majoring in the International Business Management Study Program – Regular Class (IBM-RC) who is running a virtual team. Data was gathered using online questionnaires, and then a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) test was used to confirm the components found in the research variables. The results of the study show that coordination, communication, relationship building, cohesion, trust, and reward are factors that affect the virtual team’s performance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wijaya, J., Mustikarini, C. N., & Rahman, F. A. (2023). ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING VIRTUAL TEAMS PERFORMANCE ON BUSINESS PROJECTS. Review of Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.37715/rme.v7i1.3680
Section
Articles

References

Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). Partial Least Square (PLS): Alternatif

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta:

Penerbit Andi, 22, 103–150.

Choi, S. Y., Kang, Y. S., & Lee, H. (2008). The effects of socio-technical enablers

on knowledge sharing: an exploratory examination. Journal of Information

Science, 34(5), 742–754.

Drouin, N., Bourgault, M., & Gervais, C. (2010). Effects of organizational

support on components of virtual project teams. International Journal of

Managing Projects in Business.

Garro-Abarca, V., Palos-Sanchez, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual

teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers

in Psychology, 12, 624–637.

Ghozali, I. & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi

Menggunakan Program Smartpls 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Semarang:

Badan Penerbit Undip.

Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. (2007). Virtual team leadership:

The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team

interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human

Decision Processes, 103(1), 1–20.

Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent

leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework.

Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 678–693.

Horwitz, F. M., Bravington, D., & Silvis, U. (2006). The promise of virtual

teams: identifying key factors in effectiveness and failure. Journal of

European Industrial Training, 30(6), 472–494.

Lin, C., Standing, C., & Liu, Y.-C. (2008). A model to develop effective virtual

teams. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1031–1045.

Lu, L. (2015). Building trust and cohesion in virtual teams: the developmental

approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People And Performance.

Lurey, J. S. & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in

virtual teams. Information & Management, 38(8), 523–544.

Mangkunegara, A. P. A. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan

Kesepuluh. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of

organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

Nemiro, J. E. (2016). Connection in creative virtual teams. Journal of Behavioral

and Applied Management, 2(2).

Nurmi, N., & Hinds, P. J. (2016). Job complexity and learning opportunities: A

silver lining in the design of global virtual work. Journal of International

Business Studies, 47, 631–654.

Paul, R., Drake, J. R., & Liang, H. (2016). Global virtual team performance: The

effect of coordination effectiveness, trust, and team cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(3), 186–202.

Peters, L. M. & Manz, C. C. (2007). Identifying antecedents of virtual team

collaboration. Team Performance Management: An International Journal.

Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current

literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database: the

DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6–36.

Putri, E. (2021). Pengaruh Tim Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai yang Dimediasi

Disiplin Kerja pada Kantor Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhan Batu

UMSU].

Soekanto, A. & Mustikarini, C. N. (2017). Faktor kesuksesan bisnis start-up di

Surabaya. Performa Jurnal Manajemen dan Start-Up Bisnis, Vol. 1.

Sudarmadji, C. F., Sidharta, H., & Wiryakusuma, I. G. B. Y. (2020). The effect

of entrepreneurship orientation and market orientation on marketing

performance of furniture home industry in Sawahan district. Review of

Management and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 95–116.

Tan, C. K., Teoh, A. P., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Factors influencing virtual team

performance in Malaysia. Kybernetes, 48(9), 2065–2092.

Topaloglu, M. & Anac, A. S. (2021). Exploring Major Factors Affecting Virtual

Team Performance. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(5), 107–114.

https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/09/warganet-meningkat-indonesia-perlutingkatkan-nilai-budaya-diinternet/.

https://pusdatin.kemdikbud.go.id/pembelajaran-online-di-tengah-pandemi-covid19-tantangan-yang-mendewasakan/.