Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Pasangan dengan Love Language yang Berbeda pada Mahasiswa

Main Article Content

Anastasia Jesslyn Budijono
Tifara Levi
Marissa Gabriele Hadibroto
Jessica Natalie Cheriselyn
Sophie Asha Putri

Abstract

Differing love languages can cause several aspects of needs in a romantic relationship to be unmet. Based on the high prevalence of romantic relationships in university students and the high chance of differing love languages within the relationship, this research aims to find out how couples with differing love languages can meet each others’ needs. This research is carried out using a qualitative method with instrumental study case design to 2 couples each with differing love languages. The analysis technique used in this research is the thematic analysis technique. Results show new findings that the fulfillment of needs in couples with differing love languages is done with communication, understanding, acceptance and most importantly willingness to sacrifice. This must be done by both parties. The limitation present in this study lies in the participants’ early dating age, which prevents the relevancy of data findings for long-term couples.

Article Details

How to Cite
Budijono, A. J., Levi, T., Hadibroto, M. G., Cheriselyn, J. N., & Putri, S. A. (2026). Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Pasangan dengan Love Language yang Berbeda pada Mahasiswa. Psychopreneur Journal, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37715/psy.v10i1.4488
Section
Articles

References

Adams, A. (2020). Exploring love languages: The key to building and maintaining healthy relationships [unpublished dissertation]. The State University of New York.

Almeida, T. & Lomonaco, J. F. B. (2018). O conceito de amor: Um estudo exploratório com participantes brasileiros. Pedro & João Editores.

Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2022). Putting love first: Redefining managing, organizing, and the future of work (1st ed.). Routledge.

Bland, A. M., & McQueen, K. S. (2018). The distribution of Chapman’s love language in couples: An exploratory cluster analysis. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 7(2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000102

Boozer, M. (2018). The five love languages of memoirs [unpublished dissertation]. Charlotte Teachers Institute.

Bunt, S., & Hazelwood, Z. J. (2017). Walking the walk, talking the talk: Love languages, self‐regulation, and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12182

Candela, A. M. (2019). Exploring the function of member checking. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726

Chapman, G. (2015). The five love languages: The secret to love that lasts. Northfield.

Ezer, F., & Aksüt, S. (2021). Opinions of graduate students of social studies education about qualitative research method. International Education Studies, 14(3), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n3p15

Farnsley, M. (2021). The five love languages and relationship satisfaction [unpublished dissertation]. Indiana University Southeast.

Fordham, H. (2021). Agape love in indigenous women’s memoir: A quest for justice and unity. Springer.

Henderson, V. A. (2019). Sexual assault on college campuses: Rape myth acceptance, feminine gender norms, benevolent sexism, and effects of depression and hopelessness. (unpublished dissertation). Texas Tech University.

Hercegovac, S., Kernot, J., & Stanley, M. (2020). How qualitative case study methodology informs occupational therapy practice: A scoping review. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 40(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449219850123

Heriyanto, H. (2018). Thematic analysis sebagai metode menganalisa data untuk penelitian kualitatif. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, dan Informasi, 2(3), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.2.3.317-324

Joel, S., & Macdonald, G. (2021). We’re not that choosy: Emerging evidence of a progression bias in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(5), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211025860

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Khorlina, F. M., & Setiawan, J. L. (2017). Relationship between co-parenting and communication with marital satisfaction among married couples with teenagers. Psychopreneur Journal, 1(2), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.37715/psy.v1i2.837

Kiełek-Rataj, E., Wendołowska, A., Kalus, A., & Czyżowska, D. (2020). Openness and communication effects on relationship satisfaction in women experiencing infertility or miscarriage: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165721

Kliner, O. M. (2020). The connection of personality & love: The enneagram & Chapman’s (1992) five love language model [unpublished dissertation]. Southeastern University.

Lee, F. C. (2021). Five love languages: Assessment of marital satisfaction in African American couples [unpublished dissertation]. Louisiana State University of Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Londero-Santos, A., Natividade, J. C., & Féres-Carneiro, T. (2021). Do romantic relationships promote happiness? Relationships’ characteristics as predictors of subjective well-being. Interpersonal: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 15(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.4195

Lucas, P., Fleming, J., & Bhosale, J. (2018). The utility of case study as a methodology for work-integrated learning research. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 215-222.

Maed, E. L. B., Real, N. A. S. B., Alfonso, C. M., Galveza, Z. I., Salesa, B. B., & Real, J. A. B. (2022). The love languages of generation Z in Philippine School Doha: Basis for designing the student development program. International Journal of Research Publication, 97(1), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100971320222969

Mostova, O., Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2022). I love the way you love me: Responding to partner’s love language preferences boosts satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples. PLoS One, 17(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269429

Mui, L. E. (2018). Practicing love language by spouse in reducing stress level in women. Dalam Bullare, M. I., Kiyati, C. W., & Mujat, E. A. (Eds.), Prosiding Simposium Wanita Dan Kesejahteraan Insan. Universitas Malaysia Sabah.

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145

Peetz, J., Milyavskaya, M., Kammrath, L. (2020). How partner‐satisfying decisions benefit relationships: An experience sampling study. Personal Relationsips, 28(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12357

Pietromonaco, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000129

Righetti, F., Balliet, D., Molho, C., Columbus, S., Faure, R., Bahar, Y., Iqmal, M., Semenchenko, A., & Arriaga, X. (2020). Fostering attachment security: The role of interdependent situations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207648

Rumble, A. C., Willcox, K., Imada, H., & Yansen, D. (2022). Beyond reciprocity: forgiveness, generosity, and punishment in continuing dyadic interactions. Journal of Theoritical Social Psychology, 2022(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7259257

Sels, L., Reis, H., Randall, A. K., & Verhofstadts, L. (2021). Emotion dynamics in intimate relationships: The roles of interdependence and perceived partner responsiveness. Dalam Waugh, C. E. & Kuppens, P. (Eds.), Affect dynamics (pp. 155-179). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82965-0_8

Salzwedel, E. (2021). The art of breaking up: Ending romantic relationships [unpublished dissertation]. University of South Dakota. https://red.library.usd.edu/honors-thesis/223

Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 278-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378125

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004

Surijah, E. A., & Kirana, C. T. (2020). Five love languages scale factor analysis. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 24(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1090320

Surijah, E. A., Prasetyaningsih, N. M. M., & Supriyadi, S. (2020). Popular psychology versus scientific evidence: Love languages’ factor structure and connection to marital satisfaction. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v7i2.6634

Surijah, E. A., Sabhariyanti, N. K. P. D., & Supriyadi, S. (2019). Apakah ekspresi cinta memprediksi perasaan dicintai? Kajian love language pasif dan aktif. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v6i1.4513

Utami, A. N. (2022). Ekspresi cinta pada dewasa awal yang berpacaran. Acta Psychologia, 4(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.21831/ap.v4i1.51627