GREEN BUILDING: APPROPRIATE SITE DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITAS CIPUTRA SURABAYA EXISTING BUILDING FACILITIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The topic discussed is about the application of one of the GBCI (Green Building Council Indonesia) rating tools, Appropriate Site Development (ASD), at Universitas Ciputra Surabaya. Categorized in Greenship’s existing building, ASD consists of: site management policy, motor vehicle reduction policy, community accessibility, site landscaping, heat island effect, storm water management, site management, and building neighborhood. ASD itself has a maximum score of 16 points and contributes 13.68% to the overall total Greenship rating tools (100%). As the environment’s conditions worsen, Surabaya is one of the many cities establishing Greenship criteria in various buildings’ facilities, including existing and new buildings, interior spaces, and neighborhoods. CitraLand Surabaya, under the Ciputra Group Development, is recognized for its sustainable and smart city concept, which needs to be demonstrated through the evaluation of one of its properties, Universitas Ciputra. This university has consistently increased its student enrollment each year and has ongoing development of facilities both within the campus and the surrounding area. Using a qualitative descriptive analysis method, this study narrates the Universitas Ciputra grading of ASD. It proposes several solutions, including suggestions for cost estimation on the necessary materials and equipment to improve the Universitas Ciputra building facilities.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agusintadewi, N. K., Janiawati, N. L. E., & Widiastuti, W. (2021). Appropriate Site Development in the Application of the Green Building Concept: An Evaluation of the Planning of Gianyar Public Market. Arsitektura: Jurnal Ilmiah Arsitektur dan Lingkungan Binaan, 19(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v19i2.4768.
Alamsyah Sembiring, M. Ricky, Hilma Tamiami Fachrudin, and Dwira Nirfalini Aulia.(2023). “ANALYSIS THE APPLICATION OF GREEN BUILDING PRINCIPLES IN CITRALAND GAMA CITY HOUSING BASED ON THE GREENSHIP HOMES RATING SYSTEM VERSION 1.0.” International Journal of Education and Social Science Research 06 (03): 256–78. https://doi.org/10.37500/IJESSR.2023.6322.
Bauer, Michael, Peter Mösle, and Michael Schwarz. 2009. Green Building: Guidebook for Sustainable Architecture. Illustrated. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
Biswas, M. H. A., Dey, P. R., Islam, M. S., & Mandal, S. (2022). Mathematical model applied to green building concept for sustainable cities under climate change. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 6(1), 36-50.https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n1-4.
Bithas, K. P., & Christofakis, M. (2006). Environmentally sustainable cities. Critical review and operational conditions. Sustainable development, 14(3), 177-189.https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.262.
Cantika, C. A., & Paramitadevi, Y. V. (2022). Implementation of Green Building Aspects Based on the Green Building Council Indonesia: A Case Study in the Regional Library Building of East Java Province. Journal of Architectural Research and Education, 4(1), 27-36.https://doi.org/10.17509/jare.v4i1.44459.
Girsang, Hamonangan, Aldila Septiana Hernasari, Fahmi, and Novika Candra Fetilia. 2020. “Analysis of Fulfillment Criteria of Green Building Concept in According to Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) at An Existing Conventional Building HKBP Ciputat Church.” World Journal of Innovation and Technology 1 (1): 19–33.
Green Building Council Indonesia. 2016. “Greenship Existing Building.”
Hong, C., Burney, J. A., Pongratz, J., Nabel, J. E., Mueller, N. D., Jackson, R. B., &
Davis, S. J. (2021). Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017. Nature, 589(7843), 554-561. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03138-y.
Ikmal, Novita Maulida, Miskan, and Nailun Najah. (2022a). “Analysis of The Economic Gap The Community of Citraland Surabaya and The Surrounding Region.” NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 4 (1): 145–54. https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v4i1.34.
———. (2022b). “Analysis of The Economic Gap The Community of CitraLand Surabaya and The Surrounding Region.” NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 4 (1): 145–54. https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v4i1.34.
Liu, T., Chen, L., Yang, M., Sandanayake, M., Miao, P., Shi, Y., & Yap, P. S. (2022). Sustainability considerations of green buildings: a detailed overview on current advancements and future considerations. Sustainability, 14(21), 14393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114393
Lucon, Oswaldo, Diana Ürge-Vorsatz, Azni Zain Ahmed, Hashem Akbari, Paolo Bertoldi, Luisa F. Cabeza, Nicholas Eyre, et al. 2014. “Chapter 9 - Buildings.” In In:; Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5, edited by Marilyn Brown and Tamá Pálvölgyi, 671–83.
Mardiana, A., & Riffat, S. B. (2013). Review on physical and performance parameters of heat recovery systems for building applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.016
Purbantoro, F., & Siregar, M. (2019, December). Implementation of Green Building Concept in Office Building Jakarta. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1424, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1424/1/012023.
Purwaningsih, R., Prastawa, H., Susanto, N., Saptadi, S., & Pirogo, B. (2018, October). Assessment of green building score based on greenship rating of the green building council of Indonesia. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 040004). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5061874
Sari, D. P. (2021). A review of how building mitigates the Urban heat Island in Indonesia and tropical cities. Earth, 2(3), 653-666. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth2030038.
Sasanpour, F. (2017). Livable City One Step Towards Sustainable. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2017, 1(3), 13-17.https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3673.
Sujana, C. M. (2024, April). Analysis of the implementation of green building on the Syahdan Campus building based on the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) specifications. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1324, No. 1, p. 012024). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012024.
———. 2024b. “Analysis of the Implementation of Green Building on the Syahdan Campus Building Based on the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) Specifications.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1324 (1): 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012024.
Teddy, S. D., Priatman, J., & Susilo, N. (2018). Kajian penerapan prinsip water conservation sesuai standar greenship new building versi 1.2 studi kasus: gedung P1 dan P2 Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya. Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil, 5(2), 9-16.https://doi.org/10.9744/duts.5.2.9-16.
“The Benefit of Green Building for Cost Efficiency.”(2020). International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management 1 (4). https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v1i4.152.
Yasinta, R. B., Pradana, M. A., & Dahlia, D. (2024). Analyzing Green Building of Appropriate Site Development Requirements in High Rise Building. Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, 21(1), 132-143.https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v21i1.132-143.
Yudelson, J. (2010). The green building revolution. Island Press